PressTV & Associated Press – 2012-09-21 00:42:17
http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2012/09/19/262529/usled-strike-killed-afghan-civilians/
Fact-finding Mission: Recent US-led Airstrike Killed Afghan Civilians
Press TV
KABUL (September 19, 2012) — Afghan government-appointed fact-finding mission says that a recent US-led airstrike in the eastern province of Laghman targeted civilians.
The fact-finding mission set up by President Hamed Karzai announced on Wednesday that seven women and a child were killed in the airstrike that was conducted in Alingar district on September 16. Nineteen other women and children were also injured in the attack, the mission said.
The rise in civilian casualties in NATO attacks has strained relations between Karzai and his Western allies, who are under increasing pressure at home over the unpopular war.
The US-led war in Afghanistan began in 2001. The offensive removed the Taliban from power, but insecurity continues to rise across the country despite the presence of about 130,000 foreign forces.
The United Nations announced on February 4 that 2011 was the deadliest year on record for Afghan civilians. The death toll rose eight percent compared to the year before and was roughly double the figure for 2007. Overall, 3,021 civilians died in violence related to the war and 4,507 were injured in 2011.
Related Stories:
* Karzai condemns US for killing civilians
* 24 Afghans killed in US-led airstrikes
* US-led airstrike kills 12 Afghan civilians
* US-led airstrike kills 4 in Afghanistan
* US attack kills two Afghan civilians
* ‘Airstrikes on Afghan homes to continue’
Appeals Court Judges Seem Skeptical of CIA Secrecy on Drone Program
Associated Press
WASHINGTON, D.C. (September 20, 2012) — Federal appeals court judges Thursday questioned the CIA’s efforts to block information on the use of unmanned drones to kill suspected terrorists.
A lower court federal judge sided with the CIA last year and dismissed a lawsuit by the American Civil Liberties Union seeking records about the use of drones. In response to an ACLU Freedom of Information Act request, the CIA had refused to confirm or deny the existence of responsive records.
At a hearing on its appeal of the lower court ruling, the ACLU told the three-judge panel of the US Circuit Court for the District of Columbia that several high-ranking officials, from then-CIA Director Leon Panetta to President Barack Obama, have publicly acknowledged the use of drones.
The government has argued that such statements do not specifically refer to the CIA’s involvement in drones.
But Judge Merrick Garland cited a speech this year by President Barack Obama’s counterterrorism chief, John Brennan, in which Brennan said the government targets terrorists with drones, and uses the “full range” of the government’s intelligence capabilities.
“Isn’t that an official acknowledgment that the CIA is involved with the drone program?” asked Garland, an appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton.
Stuart F. Delery, acting assistant attorney general, said Brennan’s statement wasn’t sufficient to tie the drone program to the CIA because the intelligence community has 17 agencies.
Garland said that the government was asking the court to say “the emperor has clothes, even when the emperor’s boss” says the emperor doesn’t have clothes.
Judge David Tatel, another Clinton appointee, asked about a 2010 comment that Panetta made to ABC News when he was CIA director: “… the more we continue to disrupt al-Qaida’s operations, and we are engaged in the most aggressive operations in the history of the CIA in that part of the world, and the result is that we are disrupting their leadership.”
Delery replied that Panetta did not specifically mention drones.
The CIA initially refused to admit or deny that it had any relevant records and said that merely confirming the existence of material would reveal classified information. That refusal to confirm even the existence of a record is a Cold War-era legal defense known as the Glomar response after the Glomar Explorer, a ship built with secret CIA financing to try to raise a Soviet submarine from the ocean floor.
But Delery told the court that the government was no longer making that claim. He pointed to a declaration made in June by John Bennett, director of the CIA’s National Clandestine Service, in another FOIA case pending in New York City in which the ACLU is seeking information about the targeted killings of three US citizens in Yemen.
In that declaration, Bennett said that in light of speeches made by senior US officials on the subject of killing al-Qaida leaders, the CIA conducted a search for records responsive to the ACLU’s request in the New York case.
“Based on that search, it has determined that it can now publicly acknowledge that it possesses records responsive to the ACLU’s FOIA request,” he said. But he said the spy agency can’t provide the number, nature or categorization of those records without disclosing information protected under FOIA exemptions.
Delery said that the question of whether the CIA has documents on drones is “not where we’re drawing the line.”
ACLU lawyer Jameel Jaffer said in a telephone interview that the government has “repackaged” the same argument.
“They continue to take the position that they haven’t acknowledged the CIA uses drones to carry out targeted killings,” he said.
Judges questioned Jaffer on whether a statement made by Panetta was sufficient to tie the CIA to the drone program. The ACLU cited a comment Panetta made in response to question about drones at a public event, in which he said the “operations have been very effective because they have been very precise in terms of the targeting and it involved a minimum of collateral damage.”
But Tatel noted that the questioner had asked about the “president’s strategy” in using drones, not the CIA’s.
Jaffer responded that Panetta was CIA director at the time, and spoke throughout the event about the CIA.
The ACLU’s Freedom of Information Act request seeks documents describing the legal basis for using drones as well as ones with information on civilian casualties, among other things.
The use of American drones has provoked anger abroad, particularly in Pakistan, where human rights groups say innocent people have been victims.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.
