John Glaser / AntiWar.com & Hamid Shalizi and Dylan Welch / Reuters – 2013-11-13 01:31:46
US Refuses to Cooperate With Afghan Investigation Into War Crimes
US Refuses to Cooperate With Afghan Investigation Into War Crimes
John Glaser / AntiWar.com
(November 12, 2013) — Last week, Matthieu Aikins at Rolling Stoneshed light on evidence that US forces committed war crimes against Afghans, including extra-judicial executions, torture, and disappearances of at least 17 men.
The following day, Human Rights Watch issued a statement urging an official investigation, but noted that “the US has a meager record of investigating and prosecuting human rights abuses allegedly committed by its forces during its 12-year military presence in Afghanistan.”
Today, Reuters reports on the hard evidence that the US has deliberately rebuffed efforts to investigate these murders:
Afghanistan’s intelligence service has abandoned its investigation into the murder of a group of civilians after being refused access to US Special Forces soldiers suspected of involvement, according to a document obtained by Reuters.
… In the report authored by Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security (NDS) intelligence agency, investigators said they had asked the United States for access to three US Green Berets and four Afghan translators working with them but were rebuffed.
“Despite many requests by NDS they have not cooperated. Without their cooperation this process cannot be completed,” said the report, which was originally published on September 23.
Needless to say, it’s hard to investigate a crime committed by American forces in Afghanistan if the US refuses to cooperate.
But even when investigations do occur, US soldiers typically get off easy. Eight of the nine US soldiers charged with the 2005 massacre of 24 Iraqi men, women, and children in Haditha, Iraq were not convicted. Staff Sgt. Frank Wuterich, who was charged with leading the slaughter, was convicted in a plea bargain of a single count of “dereliction of duty.” He was demoted to the rank of private and will serve no jail time.
The “Kill Team” in Afghanistan, the army unit that planned and committed executions of multiple innocent, unarmed Afghan civilians, framing the dead as having been a threat, and mutilating their corpses as trophies received light sentences as well.
All but the ringleader of the Kill Team received reduced sentences and are eligible for parole in a handful of years. Even the ringleader, described as evil by one of the other defendants, was sentenced to life in prison, but could be eligible for parole in less than 10 years.
A State Department diplomatic cable released by WikiLeaks revealed that US forces committed a heinous war crime during a house raid in Iraq in 2006, wherein one man, four women, two children, and three infants were summarily executed. Not a single American soldier was prosecuted and no investigation was initiated.
In one notable and comparable incident in February of 2010, US Special Operations Forces surrounded a house in a village in the Paktia Province in Afghanistan. Two civilian men exited the home to ask why they had been surrounded and were shot and killed. US forces then shot and killed three female relatives (a pregnant mother of ten, a pregnant mother of six, and a teenager).
US troops lied and tampered with the evidence at the scene. Investigations eventually forced the Pentagon to issue an apology, but none of the soldiers were charged with a crime.
Most of these incidents were revealed to the public because of intrepid journalism and they almost certainly represent a tiny minority of the US crimes committed in Iraq and Afghanistan with impunity.
‘Lack of US Cooperation’ Halts Afghan Probe into Civilian kKillings
Hamid Shalizi and Dylan Welch / Reuters
KABUL (November 12 2013) — Afghanistan’s intelligence service has abandoned its investigation into the murder of a group of civilians after being refused access to US Special Forces soldiers suspected of involvement, according to a document obtained by Reuters.
Seventeen men disappeared after being detained in US raids in Wardak province between October 2012 and February 2013. Bodies of 10 of the men were found by residents in shallow graves within several hundred meters of the US soldiers’ base.
Mystery surrounding their deaths has added tension to US-Afghan ties already strained over delays to a proposed security pact designed to define the future of US troops after most foreign forces leave the country by the end of next year.
In the report authored by Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security (NDS) intelligence agency, investigators said they had asked the United States for access to three US Green Berets and four Afghan translators working with them but were rebuffed.
“Despite many requests by NDS they have not cooperated. Without their cooperation this process cannot be completed,” said the report, which was originally published on September 23.
US military officials were not immediately available for comment but they have long said the Green Berets did not take part in, or turn a blind eye to, illegal killings in Wardak.
Under current rules, Afghan authorities have no right to charge US military personnel with crimes as they are immune from Afghan law under a decade-old military agreement.
Access to the American soldiers would have allowed NDS to establish if accusations put forward by Zakeria Kandahari, an Afghan translator working with the Green Berets, had substance.
The men were killed in Wardak’s Nerkh district, where a small unit of elite US Army Special Forces — known as an Operational Detachment-Alpha, or A Team — were based. US Army Special Forces are also known as Green Berets.
The investigation was launched after NDS arrested Kandahari who has himself been accused by Nerkh villagers and the NDS of involvement in the killings.
Human Rights Watch has called on the United States to investigate the incident fully.
“The US investigation should go beyond the people who carried out the killings and examine who may have assisted in the crimes or failed to take action to stop them,” a Human Rights legal adviser, Andrea Prasow, said.
(c) Thomson Reuters 2011. All rights reserved.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.
