Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com &Richard Lardner / Associated Press & – 2017-09-20 00:30:31
Senate Backs Bill to Pump $700 Billion into Military
Bill Still Needs to Reconcile With House Version
Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com
(September 18, 2017) — In an 89-8 vote, the Senate today overwhelmingly passed their version of the National Defense Authorization Act, a $700 billion military spending bill for the year. The bill still needs to be reconciled with the House version before it goes to the White House for signature.
The bill is more than the Pentagon requested, and more than the large spending increase the White House requested. At present both the House and Senate seem to be competing to see who can outspend the other with their version of the bill, while rejecting all cuts proposed by the Pentagon to keep the budget in line.
It was this massive increase that had the normally hawkish Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) as a surprise no vote on the bill. Corker said the bill blows through budget caps, and he also objected continuing to put money into “Overseas Contingency Operations” budget, where it can be shifted around at will, saying that fund has been repeatedly abused.
Though President Trump has publicly objected to several aspects of the NDAA, including the “premature” increase in spending on missile defense, there are no signs a veto is being considered, and he is expected to sign whatever Congress ultimately puts in front of him.
Senate Backs Bill to Pump $700 Billion into Military
Richard Lardner / Associated Press
The Senate has overwhelmingly approved a sweeping defense policy bill that would pump $700 billion into the military, putting the US armed forces on track for a budget greater than at any time during the decade-plus wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Senators passed the legislation by an 89-8 vote Monday. The measure authorizes $700 billion in military spending for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1, expands US missile defenses in response to North Korea’s growing hostility and refuses to allow excess military bases to be closed.
The 1,215-page measure defies a number of White House objections, but President Donald Trump hasn’t threatened to veto the measure. The bill helps him honor a pledge to rebuild an American military that he said had become depleted on former President Barack Obama’s watch.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and other national security hawks have insisted the military branches are at risk of losing their edge in combat without a dramatic influx of money to repair shortfalls in training and equipment.
An animated McCain, the Armed Services Committee chairman, bemoaned the limits imposed on military spending by both Democrats and Republicans. He said the rash of training accidents and crashes — since mid-July, nearly 100 service members have been killed or injured in close to a dozen mishaps — can be linked to the budget cuts.
“My friends, more of our men and women in uniform are now being killed in totally avoidable training accidents and routine operations than by our enemies in combat,” McCain said. “Where is the outrage about this? Where is our sense of urgency to deal with this problem?”
An animated McCain, the Armed Services Committee chairman, bemoaned the limits imposed on military spending by both Democrats and Republicans. He said the rash of training accidents and crashes — since mid-July, nearly 100 service members have been killed or injured in close to a dozen mishaps — can be linked to the budget cuts.
“My friends, more of our men and women in uniform are now being killed in totally avoidable training accidents and routine operations than by our enemies in combat,” McCain said. “Where is the outrage about this? Where is our sense of urgency to deal with this problem?”
Defense Secretary Jim Mattis said senior military leaders are taking a close look at whether strict budget constraints are to blame.
Approved by the Armed Services Committee by a 27-0 vote in late June, the overall Senate bill provides $640 billion for core Pentagon operations, such as buying weapons and paying troops, and another $60 billion for wartime missions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and elsewhere. Trump’s budget request sought $603 billion for basic functions and $65 billion for overseas missions.
With North Korea’s nuclear program a growing threat to the US and its allies, the bill includes $8.5 billion to strengthen US missile and defense systems. That’s $630 million more than the Trump administration sought for those programs, according to a committee analysis.
North Korea last week conducted its longest-ever test flight of a ballistic missile, firing an intermediate-range weapon over US ally Japan into the northern Pacific Ocean. The launch signaled both defiance of its rivals and a significant technological advance.
The legislation directs the Defense Department to deploy up to 14 additional ground-based interceptors at Fort Greely, Alaska, an increase that will expand to 58 the number of interceptors designed to destroy incoming warheads.
The department also is tasked with finding a storage site for as many as 14 other spare interceptors, and senators envision an eventual arsenal of 100 with additional missile fields in the Midwest and on the East Coast.
The White House, in a statement issued earlier this month, called the order for more interceptors “premature” given the Pentagon’s ongoing review of missile defense programs.
Despite the push for the additional billions in military spending, major hurdles need to be cleared before all the extra money materializes. Lawmakers will have to work out a deal that lifts the caps on federal agency budgets, including the Pentagon’s, mandated by a 2011 law. Congress has passed temporary relief from the limits before, but senior military officials have urged for the law to be repealed altogether.
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn., said he voted against the defense bill because the measure “blows the budget caps by nearly $83 billion.” Corker, who chairs the Foreign Relations Committee, also said the overseas missions account is “repeatedly abused” to pay for normal operations. A self-described fiscal conservative, Corker is weighing whether to run for a third term.
As their House counterparts did, the Senate bill rejects Mattis’ plan to launch a new round of base closings starting in 2021. He told lawmakers in June that closing excess installations would save $10 billion over a five-year period.
Mattis said the savings could be used to acquire four nuclear submarines or dozens of jet fighters. But military installations are prized possessions in states and lawmakers refused to go along.
The bill allots $10.6 billion for 94 Joint Strike Fighter aircraft, which is two dozen more than Trump requested. The bill also provides $25 billion to pay for 13 ships, which is $5 billion and five ships more than the Trump sought.
Copyright 2017, Chicago Tribune
Trump Wants Massive Military Parade on July 4
Said He Was Really Impressed With France’s Parade
Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com
(September 18, 2017) – Speaking today with French President Emmanuel Macron and other high-ranking officials, President Trump revealed that he thought the military parade in Paris was “tremendous.” He added that he thinks the parade was good for the “spirit of France,” and wants to do the same thing in Washington D.C. on the Fourth of July.
President Trump has been keen for some time to establish more gaudy public displays of American military might, having pushed for military vehicles to participate in his inauguration. Now, he says he wants the US military to “come marching down Pennsylvania Avenue” and suggested there would be major shows in both DC and New York City.
France’s parade was something special, as it was the 100th Bastille Day. President Trump said he intends to speak with White House Chief of Staff John F. Kelly, and that his goal would be to “try to top” France with America’s own parades.
Despite spending more on their military than anyone else in the world, the US has rarely indulged in high-profile public military parades, instead favoring civilian parades with limited military participation.
Indeed, historically the US has scorned the large military parades in nations like North Korea as signs of a childish nation obsessed with its own sense of military might.
It’s perhaps unsurprising, then, that President Trump would be so keen on organizing such parades, as he’s seen both fascinated by America’s military might and eager to prove America’s greatness in the least-subtle ways possible.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.
