(May 13, 2019) — On April 7 2018 Syrian ‘rebels’ claimed that the Syrian government used chlorine gas and Sarin in an attack on the besieged Douma suburb near the Syrian capital Damascus. They published a series of videos which showed dead bodies of mainly women and children.

The claim of the ‘chemical attack’ was made shortly after US President Trump had announced that he wanted US troops to leave Syria. It was designed to “pull him back in” which it indeed did. In an illegal ‘retaliation’ the US, Britain and France launched a number of cruise missiles against Syria. Most of them failed to reach their targets.

Moon of Alabama published a number of pieces on the issue, which are listed below.

It seemed obvious from the very first claims of the ‘gas attack’ that it did not happen at all. The Syrian government had no motive to use any chemical weapon or an irritant like chlorine in Douma. It had already won the battle. The incident was obviously staged, like others before it, to drag the US into a new attack on Syria.

Of special interest on the incident scene were two gas cylinders, which were photo- and video-graphed near to where the dead bodies were found. It was claimed that the cylinders were dropped from Syrian army helicopters and crashed through concrete roofs. One cylinder allegedly ‘bumped’ after completely penetrating the roof and came to rest on a bed. The other cylinder allegedly broke a roof open and came to rest on a balcony.

To anyone with a bit of ‘feel’ for material behavior of concrete and metal on impact, it was obvious that the damages caused on the concrete and on the cylinders were incompatible with each other. The concrete, reinforced with steel, was thoroughly penetrated while the cylinders showed only minimal damage. The roofs were most likely penetrated by artillery impact while the cylinders were most likely put there by hand.

Shortly after the incident the NATO aligned propaganda group Bellingcat asserted that the cylinders were dropped from helicopters. In June 2018 the New York Times published a rather laughable virtual crime scene analysis of the Douma incident. Neither included an engineering assessment of the impact forces and the related damages on the cylinders and roofs. Neither had visited the scene. From observing superficial visual markings both falsely concluded that the gas cylinders were dropped from helicopters.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which sent a Fact Finding Mission to the scene to investigate the case, made a detailed engineering analysis of the impact and damage. But the results of the engineering assessment were left out of its mealy-mouthed and inconclusive final report (pdf).

Now the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media obtained a copy of the 15 pages long OPCW Engineering assessment of two cylinders observed at the Douma incident – 27 February 2019 (pdf).

After testing various hypotheses through experiments, simulations and finite element analysis the engineering sub-group of the OPCW investigation concluded (emphasis added):

32. At this stage the FFM engineering sub-team cannot be certain that the cylinders at either location arrived there as a result of being dropped from an aircraft. The dimensions, characteristics and appearances of the cylinders and the surrounding scene of the incidents, were inconsistent with what would have been expected in the case of either cylinder having been delivered from an aircraft. In each case the alternative hypothesis produced the only plausible explanation for observations at the scene.

33. In summary, observations at the scene of the two locations, together with subsequent analysis, suggest that there is a higher probability that both cylinders were manually placed at those two locations rather than being delivered from aircraft.

The engineering assessment confirms our earlier conclusion. The whole scene as depicted by ‘rebels’ and propaganda organs was staged. The more than 34 dead on the scene were murdered elsewhere under unknown circumstances.

In its discussion of the OPCW engineering assessment and its suppression by the OPCW management, the Working Group states:

The new information we have removes all doubt that the organization has been hijacked at the top by France, UK and the US. We have no doubt that most OPCW staff continue to do their jobs professionally, and that some who are uneasy about the direction that the organization has taken nevertheless wish to protect its reputation. However what is at stake here is more than the reputation of the organization: the staged incident in Douma provoked a missile attack by the US, UK and France on 14 April 2018 that could have led to all-out war.

The cover-up of evidence that the Douma incident was staged is not merely misconduct. As the staging of the Douma incident entailed mass murder of civilians, those in OPCW who have suppressed the evidence of staging are, unwittingly or otherwise, colluding with mass murder.

—
Earlier coverage of the Douma incident published by Moon of Alabama:

Apl 8	–	Syria – Timelines Of ‘Gas Attacks’ Follow A Similar Scheme (Update II)
Ap l 9	–	Syria – Any US Strike Will Lead to Escalation
Ap 11	–	Syria – A US Attack Would Be Futile – But Serve A Purpose – by M. K. Bhadrakumar
Ap 11	–	Trump Asks Russia To Roll Over – It Won’t
Ap 12	–	Syria – Threat Of Large War Recedes But May Come Back
Ap 13	–	Syria – Manipulated Videos Fail To Launch World War III – Updated
Ap 14	–	F.U.K.US Strikes Syria – Who Won?
Ap 16	–	Syria – Pentagon Hides Attack Failure – 70+ Cruise Missiles Shot Down
Ap 19	–	Syria – Who Is Stalling The OPCW Investigation In Douma?
April 20	–	Syria Sitrep – Cleanup Around Damascus – WMD Rumors Prepare For New US Attack
Ju 6	–	Syria – OPCW Issues First Report Of ‘Chemical Weapon Attack’ in Douma
Ju 7	–	Syria – Mainstream Media Lie About Watchdog Report On The ‘Chemical Attack’ In Douma

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.