China Lashes Out After FBI and MI5
Accuse Beijing of International Crimes
Kyle Anzalone and Will Porter / The Libertarian Institute
(July 8, 2022) — Beijing has rejected allegations from US and British officials that it is stealing from Western firms, calling the claim “completely far-fetched” while slamming the United States as the “biggest threat to world peace and development.”
Foreign Ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian responded to the charges during his daily press briefing on Thursday, urging Washington and London to “cast away imagined demons” and stop playing up the “China threat.”
“The allegations against China are completely far-fetched and the so-called cases they listed are pure shadow chasing,” Zhao said, adding “This is a typical example of a thief crying ‘stop thief.’ We deplore this type of despicable and deceptive gambit.”
On Wednesday, FBI Director Christopher Wray and MI5 Director General Ken McCallum appeared for a joint presser largely focused on China, claiming its government is looting companies of their “world-leading expertise, technology, research, and commercial advantage.” Wray said the ruling Chinese Communist Party poses a “global threat” and stressed the need to protect corporate secrets from its grasp.
Zhao, however, argued that the claims were motivated by an “entrenched Cold War zero-sum mentality” and “ideological prejudice” against Beijing, going on to slam Washington as an aggressive imperial power.
“The US was not at war for only 16 years throughout its 240-plus years of history, which made it known as ‘the most warlike nation in the history of the world,’” he said, adding that the United States has abused its “economic, scientific and military dominance” and stoked “division and conflicts” around the world.
The back-and-forth between Zhao and Western intelligence chiefs comes as US Secretary of State Antony Blinken prepares to meet with China’s Foreign Minister Wang Yi on the sidelines of a G20 summit in Bali, Indonesia later this week.
Related
“FBI, MI5 Name Chinese Government As Top Threat to Business,” The Libertarian Institute, July 7, 2022.
NATO Leaders Call China a ‘Systemic Challenge to Euro-Atlantic Security’
For the first time, NATO singles out China
by name in its key strategy document
Priyanka Shankar / South China Morning Post
BRUSSELS (June 30, 2022) — China has been identified for the first time as a “systemic challenge to Euro-Atlantic security” in NATO’s strategic concept – a key document that sets the alliance’s military and security strategy for the next 10 years.
While expected, the move reflects rising suspicion towards China among the Western military alliance, but also a recognition of Beijing’s growing military clout.
The strategy has not been updated since 2010, and since then China has been closing the military and economic gap with the United States and other NATO members.
The document took aim at China’s relationship with Moscow. Beijing has yet to condemn Russia for its war against Ukraine and has offered rhetorical backing for its regional claims.
“The deepening strategic partnership between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation and their mutually reinforcing attempts to undercut the rules-based international order run counter to our values and interest,” the document said.
It accused Beijing of employing “a broad range of political, economic and military tools to increase its global footprint and project power, while remaining opaque about its strategy, intentions and military build-up”.
The policy document said China’s “malicious hybrid and cyber operations and its confrontational rhetoric and disinformation target allies and harm alliance security”.
It said that China sought to “control key technological and industrial sectors, critical infrastructure, and strategic materials and supply chains. It uses its economic leverage to create strategic dependencies”.
After the strategy was adopted at the NATO Summit in Madrid, Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg told reporters: “China does not share our values, and like Russia is working on undermining our values.”
“China was not mentioned in our previous strategic concept,” he said. “In this year’s strategic concept, allies have stated that the People’s Republic of China’s ambitions and coercive policies challenge our interests, security and values.”
Chinese officials reacted almost immediately in refuting the claims.
“How can an Asia-Pacific China pose any challenge to the security of a North Atlantic military alliance? In fact, it’s the other way round. It’s NATO that dropped bombs on a Chinese embassy,” Wang Lutong the Chinese foreign ministry’s top official for Europe, wrote on Twitter.
He was referring to the strike that hit Beijing’s embassy in Belgrade in 1999 during the war in then Yugoslavia, killing three Chinese journalists.
“China is never engaged in exporting values. We don’t impose our ideas on anyone. NATO should not allow itself to be used by some superpower to maintain hegemony and suppress other countries,” Wang said.
Before the summit, China’s envoy to the United Nations, Zhang Jun said: “NATO’s five eastward expansions after the Cold War have not only failed to make Europe securer, but also sowed the seed of conflict.”
“We firmly oppose certain elements clamouring for NATO’s involvement in the Asia-Pacific, or an Asia-Pacific version of NATO on the back of military alliances,” he said.
The sentiment was echoed by other Chinese diplomats on Twitter, in what appeared to be a coordinated response.
Addressing China’s reaction, Stoltenberg said on Wednesday: “NATO will remain an alliance of North America and Europe, but this region faces global threats and challenges. That is cyber, that is terrorism. But also, the security consequences of China – because that has an effect on us. And therefore it is necessary to work together, for instance, with our Asia-Pacific partners.
“Several allies also expressed concerns related to freedom of navigation. And China’s coercive and assertive behaviour in the South China Sea matters for every country in the region. But it also matters for every country concerned about the freedom of navigation.”
The NATO document did include a brief reference to cooperation with China. “We remain open to constructive engagement with the PRC, including to build reciprocal transparency, with a view to safeguarding the alliance’s security interests,” it said.
One former US official said the inclusion of China in the strategic document suggested the transatlantic gap over the China threat and Beijing’s intentions was narrowing, as seen in NATO’s changing structure.
“All allies agreed to this language,” due in part to China’s recent support for Russia, said Jim Townsend, a former US deputy assistant defence secretary for Europe and NATO under president Barack Obama. “European allies are becoming as concerned as we are about China’s international actions.”
In recognition of the alliance’s wariness of China’s threat to Indo-Pacific security, the leaders of Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand participated in the three-day summit in the Spanish capital.
Speaking to reporters in Madrid, Australia’s newly elected prime minister, Anthony Albanese, called on China to condemn Russia’s war in Ukraine.
He said he had a “very successful” meeting with the leaders of Japan, South Korea and New Zealand, where they welcomed the summit’s “important” focus on the Asia-Pacific region.
Ramon Pacheco Pardo, regional envoy for East and Southeast Asia at King’s College London said the countries’ attendance was “driven mainly by the perceived threat coming from China”.
“What really stands out for me is the number of European leaders like the Spanish prime minister who emphasised the absolute need to work with like-minded Indo-Pacific partners, essentially Australia, Japan, Korea and New Zealand,” he said.
British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said that China using its economic power in “coercive” ways should make countries reconsider trade relations with Beijing. “The G7 countries and nations such as Australia should use their economic weight to challenge China,” she said.
On the sidelines of the NATO summit, US President Joe Biden met with the leaders of Japan and South Korea. They discussed “enhancing trilateral cooperation throughout the Indo-Pacific, particularly in regard to addressing the evolving threat posed by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea’s unlawful weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missile” programmes, a White House statement said.
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said afterward that Japan intended to significantly upgrade its NATO partnership over the next five years in areas such as cyber and maritime security given that the defence of Europe is inextricably linked to that of Asia.
Kishida added that he felt a “strong sense of crisis” over the likelihood of conflict in East Asia along the lines of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, according to the Kyodo news service, given China’s opaque military buildup and provocative moves in the East and South China Seas.
Before the meeting, North Korean state news agency KCNA criticised the “US and its allies” for trying to form an “Asian NATO”.
“The US is hell-bent on military cooperation with its stooges in disregard of the primary security demand and concern by Asia-Pacific countries,” KCNA said.
The new strategic concept said: “Syria, North Korea and the Russian Federation, along with non-state actors, have resorted to the use of chemical weapons.” China’s growing nuclear activities were also mentioned in the document.
Priyanka Shankar is an independent journalist with a keen interest in press freedom, human rights and podcasting. Currently based in Brussels, her work can be seen in Deutsche Welle, Al Jazeera English, Lighthouse Reports, Middle East Eye, Reuters, and others.
China Opposes NATO’s Strategic Concept Filled with ‘Cold War Thinking and Ideological Bias’
(June 30, 2022) — China firmly opposes NATO’s so-called Strategic Concept filled with Cold War thinking and ideological bias, which is maliciously attacking and smearing China, spokesperson of the Chinese Mission to the EU said in response to NATO’s comments on China in its new Strategic Concept, vowing to make firm and strong responses toward acts that undermine China’s interests.
The NATO summit, which kicked off on June 29 in Madrid, Spain, approved a “new Strategic Concept for the Alliance,” which set out the priorities, core tasks and approaches for the next decade. It also addressed China for the first time and the challenges that Beijing poses toward Allies’ security, interests and values.
In response, spokesperson of the Chinese Mission to the EU said that as a Cold War remnant and the world’s largest military alliance, NATO has not yet abandoned its thinking and practice of creating “enemies” and engaging in bloc confrontation 30 years after the end of the Cold War.
According to the spokesperson, the Strategic Concept claims that other countries pose challenges, but it is NATO that is creating problems around the world. NATO claims to be a defensive organization that upholds the rules-based international order, but it has bypassed the UN Security Council and waged wars against sovereign states, creating huge casualties and leaving tens of millions displaced.
NATO claims that its defense zone will not go beyond the North Atlantic, but it has flexed its muscle in the Asia-Pacific region in recent years and sought to stir up bloc confrontation here, as it has done in Europe.
China pursues an independent foreign policy of peace, and is a force for world peace, a contributor to global development and a defender of the international order. China has never initiated a war or invaded an inch of other countries’ land. China does not interfere in others’ internal affairs and export ideology, still less engage in long-arm jurisdiction, unilateral sanctions or economic coercion, the spokesperson noted.
China always upholds the international system with the UN at its core, the international order underpinned by international law and the basic norms of international relations based on the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, the spokesperson said.
China has promoted the building of a community with a shared future for mankind, advanced high-quality cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative, put forward the Global Development Initiative and the Global Security Initiative, providing a large number of public goods for the international community to address major issues such as peace and development. China’s development represents an opportunity for the world, not a challenge for anyone.
We urge NATO to stop provoking confrontation by drawing ideological lines, abandon the Cold War mentality and zero-sum game approach, and stop spreading disinformation and provocative statements against China, the spokesperson said, adding that since NATO positions China as a “systemic challenge,” we have to pay close attention and respond in a coordinated way.
When it comes to acts that undermine China’s interests, we will make firm and strong responses, the spokesperson said.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.
