The Israeli Intelligence Leaks:
An Ugly Glimpse into a Dark Future
Scott Ritter / Substack
(October 23, 2024) — Whoever leaked the documents provided a crystal ball that shows what could be. It is the job of the American people to make sure it never is.
The leaking of two highly classified documents which, upon examination, appear to contain sensitive US intelligence information about Israeli military preparations for an attack on Iran, has created a storm of controversy in the United States. As US law enforcement scrambles to discover the source of the leak, very little concern is being expressed by US politicians or the American public at large over the implications not of the leaked documents, but rather the information they contained — that Israel is preparing a massive strike on Iran that could trigger a larger conflict which, realistically, could end up involving the use of nuclear weapons.
According to the leaked intelligence documents, Israel was preparing some 40 ROCKS ALBMs for a possible strike against Iran, along with 16 “Golden Horizon” ALBMs, which appear to be what is known publicly as the “Blue Sparrow” missile, an adaptation of a target missile developed by Israel to mimic the Iranian Shahab-3 ballistic missile. The ROCKS has a demonstrated range of more than 500 miles, while the “Blue Sparrow/Golden Horizon” has a range of around 1,200 miles.
The daily air strikes carried out by Israel over Lebanon and Syria provide the perfect cover for a strike on Iran. The Israelis are striking Syrian air defense sites in southern Syria daily to create a pattern of behavior while at the same time carving a path through Syrian airspace that can be used by Israeli aircraft to penetrate western Iraq, from which long-range ALBMs can be launched against Iran.
This appears to be the tactic used by Israel on April 19 of this years, when an Israeli strike package that bombed two Syrian air defense locations in southern Syria went on to enter Iraq and fire three probable ROCKS ALBMs against an Iranian S-300 air defense battery outside of Isfahan. The ROCKS ALBM uses a “Blue Sparrow” booster, one of which was found in a field south of Baghdad following the attack.
An assessment of the missile mix being prepared suggests that Israel is preparing for a major attack against a major military production facility in the vicinity of Tehran (the Parchin missile production facility comes to mind, as well as the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group) or — more likely — a decapitation strike against Iranian leadership targets in and around Tehran. The ALBM attacks would be supported by armed covert drones which would be used to track mobile targets in real time and engage if necessary, using onboard weapons.
By way of comparison, the attack conducted by the United States on the opening day of Operation Desert Storm against the eight Iraqi targets in the vicinity of Baghdad used 35 air-launched cruise missiles. Most of these missiles struck the Taji missile production and storage facility north of Baghdad. The weapons mix being prepared by Israel suggests a similar-size target package.
Iranian security forces in the streets, September 2023
But there is an additional target possibility.
In a speech delivered on September 30 — three days after Israel killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in a three-minute speech in English addressing the Iranian people, declared that “There is nowhere in the Middle East Israel cannot reach. There is nowhere we will not go to protect our people and protect our country.”
Netanyahu noted that the Iranian government was bringing Iranians “closer to the abyss,” adding that Iran and Israel would be at peace only when Iran is “finally free,” something Netanyahu said would “come a lot sooner than people think.”
If Tehran is the target, then Israel will need to neutralize Iranian air defense systems along the path of attack. If Israel repeats its past pattern of behavior, a large package of F-15I’s, supported by F-16I’s which would suppress Syrian air defenses, would penetrate western Iraq via Syria, would enter western Iraq.
The initial salvo of ALBM’s — most likely ROCKS — would be released, their intended targets being the radars associated with Iranian air defense located along the attack path. The final missiles released would be the “Blue Sparrow/Golden Horizon” missiles, which would strike their targets in and around Tehran.
The Iranian Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
These targets could include the residences of senior Iranian leadership targets, including the Supreme Leader, as well as buildings associated with the symbols of government, such as the Guardian Council, the Ministry of Intelligence, the IRGC Headquarters, and other targets identified as being supportive of the Islamic Republic.
Israel would probably follow up such an attack with an appeal to the Iranian people to revolt against the regime. This appeal would be done in concert with actions undertaken by anti-regime entities operating at the direction of Israel, the United States, and other regional actors. These would include pro-monarchy groups, the MEK, and various Kurdish, Azeri, Baluch and Arab independence movements.
Israel, the CIA, and other foreign intelligence organizations hostile to Iran attempted a similar revolt against the Iranian government in September 2023, following the death of Mahsa Amini while in police custody. What started as localized demonstrations exploded into outright insurrection which took the lives of some 550 protestors/insurgents and nearly 70 Iranian security personnel before being violently suppressed.
Israel would be looking to repeat this kind of insurrection, but this time helping it by preemptively dealing a fatal blow to Iranian leadership.
The odds of Israel being able to pull such a decapitation strike off are slim. Likewise, given the recent suppression of anti-regime groups by the Iranian government, it is unlikely those the Israeli government are hoping will revolt against the Iranian regime have reconstituted themselves in any meaningful manner.
Moreover, by focusing on a decapitation strike, Israel will have done little to prevent Iran from launching its own massive retaliation attack on Israel. Perhaps the Israeli leadership believes that once it takes out the senior-most levels of Iranian leadership, the resolve to strike back will wane. It’s a heavy gamble, however, and Israel risks suffering existential levels of damage from any concerted Iranian retaliatory strike.
US intelligence indicated that Israel’s nuclear deterrence capability, in the form of its Jericho missiles, were not being readied for action. This, however, would not be the case if Iran launched missile attacks against Israel that threatened its very existence. This is the very scenario that the Israeli “Jericho Option” (i.e., nuclear weapons capability) was created for.
The fact is, if Israel launches a decapitation strike against Iran, it will likely fail. The Iranian counterstrike, however, will be very much on target. And the Israeli nuclear retaliation, at that point, becomes probable.
Americans should let this sink in as we ponder the meaning of the leaked intelligence documents. If the purpose of the leak was to wake the American people, and by extension the American government, up about the danger posed by an Israeli strike against Iran, so far it appears that the mission has failed.
In that case, we will reap what we have sown.
Wake up, America.
It’s your future on the line.
In Response to Ritter’s Warnings
Steven Starr / World BEYOND War Discussion Group
(October 23, 2024) — Leaked U.S. classified documents indicate that Israel is preparing a massive strike against Iran.
Do the Israelis hope that a “decapitating” strike against Iranian leadership and military targets will lead to regime change in Iran, precluding further hostilities? Or is the plan to provoke a huge Iranian response that will “justify” the use of Israeli nuclear weapons in its following strike against Iran?
The idea of inciting regime change in Iran through military action against it reminds me of the “strategy” pursued by Washington in Ukraine. Cause enough pain in Russia via military means and the Russians will revolt and remove Putin. How is that working out?
Ritter believes that a massive attack on Iran by Israel will undoubtedly lead to a huge retaliatory strike against Israel by Iran. He suggests that the odds are high that Israel will then choose to use nuclear weapons against Iran.
During the last year, a single phone call from the White House to Israel, informing Netanyahu that the U.S. was stopping its shipments of arms and munitions, could have stopped the genocide and ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the West Bank.
Instead, the Biden-Harris administration chose to enable the slaughter with a continuous airlift of weapons and munitions that continues to this day. The U.S. support of genocide in Gaza has unleashed the bloodthirsty Zionists, who have now initiated a massive bombing campaign against Lebanon that has displaced 1/4 of the total Lebanese population.
Not content with this new war in Lebanon, Israel (with a population of 9 million people) is set to embark on another full-scale war, this time against Iran (a nation of 91 million people). This surely suits the neocons in Washington, who have wanted a war with Iran for decades. The most influential of these neocons — Biden, Blinken, Sullivan, Nuland — are also Zionists. They have sent two US Carrier Strike Groups (the USS Theodore Roosevelt and USS Abraham Lincoln) to the Middle East to back up Israel.
Iran has spent decades preparing for a war with Israel. They have a massive arsenal of missiles that can inflict huge damage on Israeli infrastructure, leaving Israel without the ability to generate electricity or create drinking water. It’s hard to live in the desert without such things — just ask the Palestinians.
In addition to having the largest arsenal of missiles in the Middle East, the Iranians are a virtual nuclear weapons state — they can manufacture 5 or 6 nuclear weapons in a matter of days. Israel creates an existential threat to itself by launching a massive attack against Iran.
Despite public hand-wringing by the officials of the Biden regime, they support an attack on Iran, just as long as it doesn’t interfere with a Democratic victory in the upcoming presidential election.
Many believe we are in the “end times” that will see a final battle in the Middle East called “Armageddon.” I have never believed in this sort of prophecy, but it seems it is becoming a distinct possibility
