Environmentalists Against War
Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are

 

 

ACTION ALERT: Defend Net Neutrality. Save the Internet. Sign Here


May 16, 2014
Bold Progressives.org & MoveOn.org & The Washington Post

Two weeks ago, the FCC seemed set to destroy Net Neutrality. Today, after immense public pressure, the FCC voted to invite public feedback on two proposals -- the bad one and an awesome one. We have 120 days to act. During this time, telecom industry lobbyists will swarm Washington, DC. What do we have? The power of Internet. If you wish to demand Net Neutrality, sign now.

http://act.boldprogressives.org/survey/NoSlowLane/

'This Is the Free Speech Issue of Our Time.'
Big News about the Internet!

Keith Rouda / Bold Progressives.org

(May 15, 2014) -- BREAKING NEWS: Today, after immense public pressure, the FCC voted to invite public feedback on two proposals -- the bad one and an awesome one.

Two weeks ago, the FCC seemed set to destroy Net Neutrality. FCC Chair Tom Wheeler's preferred plan would create a fast lane for big corporations and a slow lane for everyone else. The alternative proposal would reclassify the Internet as a public utility like water -- equally accessible to all.

Which plan wins is up to you. Are you willing to fight this battle for the future of the Internet?

We have 120 days to act.

During this time, telecom industry lobbyists will swarm Washington, DC. What do we have? The power of Internet.

We have millions of everyday Americans who use the Internet for fun, for work, for innovation -- and who don't want some websites working better than others based on who bribes Comcast or AT&T the most.

Our PCCC activism already got a direct response from the White House, distancing itself from the FCC's bad proposal. Al Franken, Elizabeth Warren, and others have joined our fight.

ACTION -- Demand Net Neutrality. Sign Now: Sign the petition to help us pressure the FCC, Congress, and the White House to enshrine Net Neutrality into law.

The Wall Street Journal just reported that public pressure got the FCC Chair to start backtracking on his assault on Net Neutrality! For the first time, a new proposal would reclassify the Internet as a public utility like water -- accessible equally to all.

Sign our petition to public officials:
Reclassifying the Internet as a public utility is the gold standard of Internet freedom.
The new FCC Chair should fully support Net Neutrality -- or step down so President Obama can appoint someone who will.

Watch Al Franken's video to PCCC members on why Net Neutrality is vital.





ACTION ALERT: Save the Internet
Moveon.org

(May 15, 2014) -- The FCC just took the first step toward killing Net Neutrality, by moving ahead with a plan to divide the Internet into a fast lane for the 1% and a slow lane for the rest of us.1

But we can still win the fight for an open Internet. MoveOn members and allies have already succeeded in getting a real solution on the table: to reclassify the Internet as a public utility like drinking water—making it equally accessible to all.2 For the next 60 days the FCC will take public comments on the proposal. We have 60 days to win by doubling down on our campaign now.

As FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn said, "the real call to action begins after the vote today. This is your opportunity to formally make your points on the record. You have the ear of the entire FCC."3

And we're doing just that. MoveOn members are literally in the streets at 19 local FCC offices across the country right now—sending shockwaves through the FCC bureaucracy.

But to keep this campaign going for the next 60 days, we need to raise $150,000 to launch the next phase.

With the support of MoveOn members, we will:

Drive phone calls to the White House so that President Obama has to hold FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler accountable for his promise to protect Net Neutrality—building on the thousands of calls members have already made

Launch a new round of ads to raise awareness of what's at stake and continue to pressure President Obama and Chairman Wheeler

Deliver thousands of public comments to the FCC in support of the real solution—treating the Internet as a public utility

Continue to amplify the more than 10,000 personal stories from MoveOn members who would be hurt if the FCC adopts this plan

We know that corporations like Verizon and Comcast aren't going to sit this out. They will be deploying their lobbyists and putting their money behind killing Net Neutrality. But we have already proven that MoveOn members can fight back, if we do it together.

Together we'll make sure the FCC feels enough sustained public pressure that there is no way they can kill Net Neutrality.

Sources:
"FCC approves plan to consider paid priority on Internet," The Washington Post, May 15, 2014 
http://www.moveon.org/r/?r=298318&id=95788-23936879-pBfeWEx&t=4

"FCC Votes For Plan To Kill Net Neutrality," Huffington Post, May 15, 2014 
http://www.moveon.org/r/?r=298323&id=95788-23936879-pBfeWEx&t=5


FCC Votes to Advance Paid Priority Internet, Blow to Net Neutrality
Cecilia Kang / The Washington Post

(May 15, 2014) -- The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday voted in favor of advancing a proposal that could dramatically reshape the way consumers experience the Internet, opening the possibility of Internet service providers charging Web sites for higher-quality delivery of their content to American consumers.

The plan, approved in a three-to-two vote along party lines, could unleash a new economy on the Web where an Internet service provider such as Verizon would charge a Web site such as Netflix for the guarantee of flawless video streaming.

The proposal is not a final rule, but the vote on Thursday is a significant step forward on a controversial idea that has invited fierce opposition from consumer advocates, Silicon Valley heavyweights, and Democratic lawmakers. The FCC will now open the proposal to a total 120 days of public comment. Final rules, aimed for the end of the year, could be rewritten after the agency reviews the public comments.

After weeks of public outcry over the proposal, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler said the agency would not allow for unfair, or "commercially unreasonable," business practices. He wouldn't accept, for instance, practices that leave a consumer with slower downloads of some Web sites than what the consumer paid for from their Internet service provider.

He said his plan asks whether paid prioritization should be banned outright, but he still moved forward with a proposal allowing new business arrangements between Internet service providers -- such a AT&T, Verizon and Time Warner Cable -- and Web content providers, such as Facebook, Google and online startups.

"There is one Internet. It must be fast, it must be robust, and it must be open," Wheeler said. "The prospect of a gatekeeper choosing winners and losers on the Internet is unacceptable."

He stressed consumers would be guaranteed a baseline of service and that the agency would beef up enforcement of companies that strike deals that are harmful for consumers or anticompetitive.

"If a network operator slowed the speed of service below that which the consumer bought, it would be commercially unreasonable and therefore prohibited," Wheeler aid. "If the network operator blocked access to lawful content, it would violate our no-blocking rule and therefore be doubly prohibited."

Such business models have drawn fierce criticism from investors, startups and big Silicon Valley firms. They say smaller companies that can't afford to pay for faster delivery would likely face additional obstacles against bigger rivals. And consumers could see a trickle-down effect of higher prices as Web sites try to pass along new costs of doing business with Internet service providers.

One of the Democratic commissioners who voted yes on Thursday expressed some misgivings about how the proposal had been handled.

"I would have done this differently. I would have taken the time to consider the future," said Democratic Commissioner Jessica Rosenworcel, who said the proposal can't allow for clear fast lanes for the most privileged companies. She said she supported a proposal allowing the agency to consider questions on how it could prevent certain Web sites from being blocked, in addition to figuring out the overall oversight of broadband Internet providers.

"I believe the process that got us to rulemaking today was flawed," she said. "I would have preferred a delay."

Wheeler's proposal is part of a larger "net neutrality" plan that forbids Internet service providers from outright blocking Web sites. And he promised a series of measures to ensure the new paid prioritization practices are done fairly and don't harm consumers. The agency said it had developed a "multifaceted dispute resolution process" on enforcement and would consider appointing an "ombudsman" to oversee the process.

But some consumer advocates doubt the FCC can effectively enforce anti-competitive practices or ensure consumers aren't stuck with fewer choices or poorer service. They note that the FCC will only investigate complaints brought to them, and many small companies and consumers don't have resources to alert the agency.

One proposal that consumer groups applauded was on the open question of whether the government should redefine broadband Internet as a public utility, like phone service, which would come with much more oversight from the FCC.

"Agencies almost always change their rules from the initial proposal -- that is why we have a whole notice and comment period, so that the agency can hear from the public and be educated into making the right decision (or at least the least bad decision)," said Harold Feld, a vice president at Public Knowledge, a media and technology policy public interest group. "Do not freak about the tentative conclusion and proposed rules."

The next phase will be four months of public comments, after which the commissioners will vote again on redrafted rules that are meant to take into account public opinion. But the enactment of final rules faces significant challenges.

The proposal has sparked a massive fight between two of the most powerful industries in the country — on one side, Silicon Valley, and on the other, companies such as Verizon and AT&T that built the pipes delivering Web content to consumers’ homes. The telecom companies argue that without being able to charge tech firms for higher-speed connections, they will be unable to invest in faster connections for consumers.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.

back

 

 

Stay Connected
Sign up to receive our weekly updates. We promise not to sell, trade or give away your email address.
Email Address:
Full Name:
 

 

Search Environmentalists Against War website

 

Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are