Dark Money Could be Pushing for the Next War
November 27, 2015
Robert Naiman and Avram Reisman / Just Foreign Policy & Robert Naiman / TalkingPointsMemo
Pentagon contractors and a small group of super-wealthy individuals are trying to influence US foreign policy in a direction that would replace diplomacy with military aggression. The influence of "dark money" threatens not just 319 million Americans but also the other 7 billion people living everywhere else in the world. The Citizens United decision unleashed a new level of influence over war and peace. But President Obama can counter this with the stroke of a pen.
ACTION ALERT: Dark Money Could be Pushing for the Next War
Robert Naiman and Avram Reisman / Just Foreign Policy
The Citizens United decision unleashed a new level of influence over war and peace for corporations. But there's something President Obama can do, with the stroke of a pen, to reduce that influence.
Corporations awarded federal contracts -- including Pentagon contractors -- should be required to disclose their political donations to candidates and SuperPACs. We deserve to know which political campaigns are funded by companies to whom our tax-dollars are awarded.
It is imperative that corporations that profit from our wars of choice are no longer able to hide their donations in SuperPACs that support intervention and oppose deals like the Iran Nuclear Agreement.  That's why President Obama should sign an executive order mandating disclosure today.
Call the White House NOW at 1-888-894-6720 and say,
"I urge President Obama to issue an executive order without delay requiring companies that receive taxpayer money from federal contracts to disclose their political spending."
When you're done, please report your call here:
Today, over 750,000 signatures will be delivered to the White House in support of an executive order instituting transparency for federal contractors' political donations. Over 13,000 are Just Foreign Policy subscribers.
If you haven't signed our petition, you can do that here:
Thanks for all you do to help make US foreign policy more just.
The Iran Deal's Latest Hurdle: Big Donors
Robert Naiman / TalkingPointsMemo
(September 2, 2015) -- If passed, the Iran Deal will be the biggest diplomatic achievement of the Obama presidency. Painstakingly negotiated over the course of two years between the United Kingdom, Russia, France, China, Germany, the US, and Iran, the deal prevents Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon in exchange for relief from financial sanctions that have crippled its economy.
Unanimously ratified by the UN Security Council, the deal imposes the strictest inspections system ever established. The deal ensures UN inspectors have 24/7 access to nuclear facilities. It requires Iran to dissolve 98 percent of its nuclear stockpile, and mandates surveillance over every step of the process. Negotiators have left no stone unturned to block Iran's pathway to a nuclear bomb.
Naturally, when policy of this magnitude is discussed, Representatives and Senators speak to a number of groups, constituents, foreign policy, military, and nuclear weapons experts that all have a vested interest. Seven Nobel laureates; 36 Generals and Admirals; and 75 nuclear scientists all support the deal.
100-plus former Ambassadors including former ambassadors to Israel, 60 national security experts, and even a former director of an anti-Iran Deal group support it, too. Polls have even shown that the majority of American Jews support diplomacy over war, while both Jewish and Christian religious leaders support the deal.
Two more Democratic senators announced their support for the deal yesterday, making it almost certain the president will have the votes to pass it.
Despite this, there is still one barrier that Congress is struggling to overcome before the voting even begins: their reelections.
Big donors aren't as favorable toward the Iran Deal as others. Opponents have spent $11 million on a TV ad blitz to influence Members of Congress against this deal. Other big donors like Sheldon Adelson and Paul Singer are using their large personal fortunes to hold billionaire primaries for presidential candidates, hoping to influence the next president to rescind the deal.
This small group of individuals is trying to influence foreign policy that doesn't just have implications for 319 million Americans but global effects for the other 7 billion people living everywhere else in the world.
Pentagon contractors are in the mix too. They've been bankrolling a pro-Lindsey Graham SuperPAC because of his opposition to the deal and have even started some political groups to push presidential candidates to be more hawkish on issues of national security.
This isn't the first time defense contractors have tried to shift American policy in their favor. Last year MapLight found their monetary footprint during the debate to continue a police militarization program.
Members of Congress who supported continuing the program, which transfers military equipment to local police forces, received 73 percent more money from defense contractors than opponents of the bill.
The defense industry saw the financial benefits of providing military equipment to our local police forces then and they see the same opportunity now with an Iran Deal downfall.
Unfortunately, because of Citizens United they might not be the only way these defense contractors are trying to fatten their wallets at the expense of our national security. The rise of dark money groups -- anonymously supported nonprofits -- could be providing these defense contractors another avenue to affect our elections.
Because these dark money groups don't have to report the names of anyone who gave them money, federal contractors can hide their influence.
When Iraq War hawks and defense contractors write bigger checks, everyday voters pay the price with a government playing politics with a nuclear warhead.
To help defend the Iran Deal and other diplomatic initiatives from the influence of big money, President Obama should sign an executive order that would require any business with a federal contract to disclose every cent they spent in our elections.
The companies that are paid billions of dollars every year to help protect and improve the national security of this country should not be manipulating Congress or using secretive loopholes in our campaign finance system to support a path toward war for the sake of their own wallets.
Robert Naiman is the Policy Director at Just Foreign Policy, a non-partisan membership organization dedicated to reforming U.S. foreign policy based on diplomacy and cooperation
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.