House Passes $578 Billion Military Spending Bill
March 9, 2017
Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com & Richard Lardner / Associated Press
With massive majorities in both parties, Congress has voted in favor of a massive $578 billion military spending bill to cover the remainder of fiscal year 2017. The bill now moves on to the Senate, where it is expected to pass. The exact meaning of the figures is a little difficult to understand because Congress had already passed a FY2017 military spending bill for $611 billion back in December. Adding to the war-pork: Donald Trump hopes to add another $30 billion and has promised an overall 9% spending hike in FY2018.
House Passes $578 Billion Military Spending Bill
Bill Moves on to Senate, Expected to Easily Pass There
Jason Ditz / AntiWar.com
(March 8, 2017) -- The House of Representatives today voted 371-48, with massive majorities in both parties, in favor of another $578 billion military spending bill to cover the remainder of fiscal year 2017. The bill now moves on to the Senate, where it again is expected to easily pass.
The exact meaning of the figures is a little difficult to understand this time around, because Congress had already passed a military spending bill for fiscal year 2017 back in December, which was $611 billion.
That bill was only ever intended to be a fraction of what was to be spent, aiming to give way to a second "emergency" bill before April, which is today's bill, which would cover the rest of the year. That said, there is a lot of overlap between the two and the overall budget is not just a matter of adding the two together.
Indeed, the $578 billion one voted on today probably will be bigger by the time it gets signed, with President Trump seeking to add another $30 billion, which is meant to be a first step toward what he promises will be a 9% increase in spending in fiscal year 2018.
The new bill intends $516 billion for "basic" military requirements, which is more than double any other nation on the planet's spending, and also includes about $62 billion in additional spending for America's assorted wars and occupations.
The only potential obstacle in the Senate is from the usual hawks like Sens. Lindsey Graham (R -- SC) and John McCain (R -- AZ), for whom any military budget, no matter how substantial its growth, is much too small, and doesn't include nearly enough new wars to appear sufficiently patriotic.
House OKs $578 Billion Military Spending Bill
Richard Lardner / Associated Press
WASHINGTON (March 8, 2017) -- The House voted decisively Wednesday to approve a $578 billion spending bill that keeps the US armed forces operating through September and sets the stage for substantial increases to the Pentagon's budget advocated by President Donald Trump.
The fiscal year 2017 defense legislation passed the GOP-led chamber by a wide margin, 371-48, clearing the way for the Senate to act. The Trump administration is preparing a $30 billion supplement to the bill, which serves as a down payment on the president's promise to repair what he and other Republicans have described as a military "depleted" by the Obama administration's refusal to spend enough money.
The United States spends more on defense than the next seven nations combined. Yet GOP defense hawks are pressing Trump to spend tens of billions more on defense than he's envisioned for the next budget year.
The 2017 defense legislation, crafted by House and Senate negotiators from both parties, tracks the funding levels for Pentagon procurement, operation and maintenance, and research and development programs authorized by the annual defense policy bill that former President Barack Obama signed into law in December.
The spending bill has $516 billion for basic military requirements, which covers everything from the purchase of bombs and bullets to troop training. Nearly $62 billion is included in the bill to pay for ongoing military operations in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere.
Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen, R-N.J., the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, said passage of the 2017 bill returns badly needed financial stability to the armed forces.
The Pentagon and other federal agencies are currently running under a stopgap spending bill that expires April 28. Congress approved the temporary measure to avoid a government shutdown late last year, triggered by persistent bickering among Republicans and Democrats over spending levels for the Pentagon and other federal agencies.
Senior US military commanders have decried the frequent use of stopgap spending bills, which are known as continuing resolutions. Under these short-term agreements, the Pentagon's budget is set at the previous year's level and the military services are barred from starting new programs.
The lack of steady funding has led the services to borrow money from their procurement and training accounts to pay for ongoing military operations. That's prevented them from being able to buy new equipment and adequately prepare troops for combat.
"Continuing resolutions are bad for our troops," said Rep. Martha McSally, R-Ariz., a retired Air Force fighter pilot. "We are in a military readiness crisis like I have not seen in my lifetime."
The spending bill also provides $980 million to train and equip foreign forces to combat the Islamic State group.
Another $150 million is allotted in the bill to supply Ukraine with lethal and nonlethal aid to counter Russian aggression. Moscow's annexation of Crimea in 2014 and its incursions into eastern Ukraine have drawn widespread condemnation in Europe and the United States along with a raft of economic penalties.
There's also $3.4 billion for the European Reassurance Initiative, another program aimed at countering Russian threats.
For the 2018 budget year, which begins Oct. 1, Trump has previewed a base defense budget for 2018 that is $54 billion above the spending caps mandated by a rule known in Washington-speak as sequestration.
But 33 Republican members of the House Armed Services Committee want him to add at least another $37 billion, for a total increase next year of $91 billion beyond the caps. In a letter to the House Budget Committee released Wednesday, the lawmakers said that's the amount needed to begin reversing the erosion of the military's combat readiness.
Trump's envisioned level, they wrote, "would unintentionally lock in a slow fix to readiness, consistent with the Obama administration's previous position, from which we would not be able to dig out."
Copyright 2017 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.