Environmentalists Against War
Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are

 

 

Trump's Syria Plan Looks a Lot Like 'Mission Creep'


March 20, 2017
Military Times Editorial & Al Jazeera

The US military has sent nearly 100 Army Rangers into the Syrian city of Manbij. But there is something highly unusual about this particular deployment. The elite soldiers, who typically operate in the shadows, arrived in armored vehicles festooned in brightly colored American flags, a gesture designed to make their presence abundantly obvious. And unlike the other 15,000 US troops on the ground in active war zones, the Americans in Manbij are not conducting "counter terror" or "advise and assist" operations.

http://www.militarytimes.com/articles/manbij-syria-us-troops-reassurance-and-deterrence

The Pentagon's 'Reassure and Deter' Mission
In Syria Looks a Lot Like 'Mission Creep'

Military Times Editorial

(March 18, 2017) -- The US military has sent nearly 100 Army Rangers into the Syrian city of Manbij. But there is something highly unusual about this particular deployment.

The elite soldiers, who typically operate in the shadows, arrived in armored vehicles festooned in brightly colored American flags, a gesture designed to make their presence abundantly obvious. And unlike the other 15,000 US troops on the ground in active war zones, the Americans in Manbij are not conducting "counter terror" or "advise and assist" operations.

Rather, the Pentagon has quietly unveiled a new kind of mission: It's called "reassurance and deterrence."

There are no Islamic State extremists in rubble-strewn Manbij. ISIS fled in defeat many months ago. Instead, the city is occupied by a council of Kurdish militia fighters whom the US has supported for many years. And all around the city are forces backed by the Turkish military, a fellow NATO member that's played a significant role in eradicating ISIS strongholds in Syria.

The problem is that even though both groups are US allies, the Turks and the Kurds despise each other. Like so many other groups in the Middle East, it's an ethnic rivalry that dates back centuries.

And so, when Turkey's outspoken president recently called for Manbij to be liberated from the Kurds, the Rangers were sent in to "make sure the parties on the ground aren't shooting at each other," says the Pentagon's top spokesman, Navy Capt. Jeff Davis.

This is a dangerous task that raises several questions.

First: What exactly are the Americans supposed to do if the Turks and Kurds start shooting at each other? The Pentagon won't disclose the answer, other than to say US personnel retain the right to defend themselves.

Second: Are they trained for a "reassurance and deterrence" mission and, if so, what does that entail? For most of the past 15 years, the military's pre-deployment workups have focused on preparing for conventional war and counter-insurgency fights. What tactics, techniques and procedures are unique to the operation in Manjib? Has the Army given these soldiers the tools to be successful?

Third: What is the Pentagon's strategy in Manbij? Its broader objective in Iraq and Syria is to defeat the Islamic State. How does the deployment of 100 American soldiers into Manbij further that goal? It sounds like mission creep.

Fourth: Do military leaders, specifically the Joint Chiefs of Staff, truly endorse this mission -- or is it strategic drift? On its surface, "reassurance and deterrence" looks and feels half-baked, a plan that mostly relies on vestiges of former President Obama's vision for the Middle East. Was this necessitated by the strategic vacuum resulting from the White House's difficulty assembling a stable national security team?

Fifth: What does victory look in Manbij? Surely, no one believes a brief deployment of a few dozen US troops will end centuries of regional rivalry between the Turks and the Kurds. How will the Pentagon know when its "reassurance and deterrence" mission is complete and whether it was successful?

These Americans are operating in the open where they are vulnerable to attack, whether intentional or accidental. The recent arrival of Russian military forces to Manbij only heightens that risk.

It is imperative for the president and the Pentagon to explain their plan for ensuring this city remains secure, so its residents can start to rebuild -- and so the US can pull out. "Reassurance and deterrence" is not a long-term strategy.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.



Obama's War: 167 Civilians Killed in
'US-led Strikes' on Manbij over Two Months in 2016

Al Jazeera



(July 20, 2016) -- Dozens of civilians have been killed in US-led air strikes against areas in Syria held by the Islamic State of Syria and the Levant group (ISIL, also known as ISIS), a monitoring group said. A total of 167 have been killed since May. The dead include 44 children and 17 women. The US Central Command has confirmed that it was conducting strikes in the area and says it will investigate allegations of massive civilian deaths.

back

 

 

Stay Connected
Sign up to receive our weekly updates. We promise not to sell, trade or give away your email address.
Email Address:
Full Name:
 

 

Search Environmentalists Against War website

 

Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are