ACTION ALERT: A Peace Monument for Charlottesville and Nine Truths
August 15, 2017
David Swanson / World Beyond War
Charlottesville has three Confederate war monuments, one WW I monument and one Vietnam War monument. RootsAction.org, World Beyond War, Pax Christi Charlottesville, Amnesty International Charlottesville, and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice are proposing creation of a monument to peace.
A peace pole is one easy -- and widely recognized -- way to mark a public interest in nonviolence. Note: Armed attacks with fists and clubs are not covered by the First Amendment.
Charlottesville Needs a Peace Monument
David Swanson / World Beyond War
To the Charlottesville City Council:
Charlottesville Virginia has three Confederate war monuments, one World War I monument, one Vietnam War monument, two (pro) Native American genocide monuments, one statue of Thomas Jefferson, one statue of Homer (poet of war), and no major monuments to anything else.
Here's a proposal backed by RootsAction.org, World Beyond War, Pax Christi Charlottesville, Amnesty International Charlottesville, and the Charlottesville Center for Peace and Justice:
Install a Peace Pole as a public monument to nonviolence. A peace pole is one easy -- and widely recognized -- way to mark a public interest in peace. Any public memorial to efforts for peace would work.
Charlottesville desperately needs memorials to the struggles of Native Americans, against slavery, for integration, for women's rights, for workers' rights, for education and arts, and everything other than war. A peace monument is a place to start.
Charlottesville, Virginia, has the potential to be a leader for peace at home and abroad. Its city council in recent years passed resolutions against the war on Iraq, against threatening Iran, against drones, and in favor of moving resources from wasteful and deadly military spending to human and environmental needs. Other cities and towns followed Charlottesville's lead on some of these measures.
Charlottesville now needs to be a voice for peace and nonviolence more than ever. The city's support for peace, like its opposition to racism, is nowhere visible on the public landscape.
Charlottesville has four sister cities, and signs indicating them are visible in Charlottesville. But the motto of Sister Cities International, "Peace Through People," is nowhere to be found. There is no location set aside to celebrate these relationships, as there could be in combination with a peace pole.
Please sign the petition so that we can deliver it to Charlottesville City Council. Please share it widely. Please add your name to our petition to create a peace monument.
Top Misconceptions About Charlottesville
David Swanson / DavidSwanson.org
(August 14, 2017) -- Charlottesville is a small town with the University of Virginia, a pedestrian downtown street, and very few monuments. The three located right downtown are for Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, and the Confederacy. Neither Lee nor Jackson had anything to do with Charlottesville, and their statues were put up in whites-only parks in the 1920s.
1. The racists who have begun coming to Charlottesville to campaign for governor, garner attention, threaten violence, engage in violence, and commit murder are almost all from outside Charlottesville, and extremely unwelcome here.
Charlottesville is a slightly left-of-center, Democratic Party area. Most people don't rally for good causes or against bad ones. Most people don't want the Lee statue taken down. (Or at least they didn't until it became a gathering point for neo-Confederates.)
Most people want other memorials added to public space to diversify. And most people don't want white supremacists coming to town with their hatred and their violence.
2. Armed attacks are not covered by the First Amendment.
I can and have argued at length for the strategic -- never mind legal -- need to respect odious free speech, and -- more importantly -- to respect and build bridges of understanding to the troubled people preaching hatred. But the human right to free speech is not found in a gun or a torch or a can of pepper spray any more than in corporate advertising.
When we hold peace rallies in US cities, we are sometimes forbidden to bring posters on wooden poles. We have to use hollow cardboard tubes to hold up our signs, because -- you know -- advocates of nonviolence can be so violent.
Yet racist, nationalist, white supremacist agitators are allowed to bring an arsenal with which to attack the general public and counter-demonstrators! Whatever that is, it is not free speech. I'd be willing to say it's closer to enabling terrorism.
All media habits of "balance" and "even handedness" become lies when respect for rights, and blame for deaths and injuries, are based on the notion that premeditated violence and threats of violence and the carrying of weapons are not worth noticing.
3. Charlottesville's mayor voted against taking down the Lee statue
-- even if he now sounds on NBC News as if it had been his idea. Seen from a certain angle, that's progress. I want people to get on board with the idea of taking down all racist monuments and all war monuments, and this one is both. But it is a misconception to imagine that the decision to take down General Lee came from the top or that it came without extensive public input.
It's true that City Council member Kristin Szakos publicly proposed the dominance of our public space by Confederate statues as a problem, and that City Council member Wes Bellamy pushed for that. But it was the national movement of Black Lives Matter, and local activism, that created the demand in the first place, as well as making Bellamy a member of City Council. The City held very lengthy and public and extensive hearings and gathering of facts and views.
A Blue Ribbon Commission produced a report. And when the City Council voted to take down Lee (but leave up Jackson) it did so because City Council Member Bob Fenwick joined Szakos and Bellamy in a 3-2 vote, in which Mayor Mike Signer was on the losing and cowardly side. Because that is typical of him, we should be wary of false perceptions of him as a leader, until he really becomes one. It's possible that had he shown the leadership of the Mayor of New Orleans in taking down statues and explaining why, we wouldn't be in this mess.
4. The military and militarized police are not here to protect you.
An armed force on the streets and in the air of Charlottesville crashed a helicopter, tragically killing two people. But what else did it accomplish? It heightened tensions. It reduced turnout by those opposed to violence and racism. Its aggression toward anti-racists following the KKK rally in July contributed to fears of what it would do this time.
The Charlottesville police do not need the mine-resistant vehicle they keep in their garage, because we do not have land mines. We do not need our skies filled -- including on the Friday before the rally -- with military helicopters. We do not need tanks on our streets for godsake. We need to disarm those seeking to exercise their First Amendment Rights, not arm someone else.
The helicopter never should have crashed because it never should have flown. And every individual who assaulted and threatened people with pepper spray, torches, sticks, fists, or an automobile, should have been welcomed to nonviolently, without guns or other weaponry, speak their mind -- and to meet and converse with those opposing their views.
5. The events in Charlottesville, like foreign and domestic emoluments, additional forms of financial corruption, Muslim bans, illegal wars, threats to North Korea, voter intimidation, environmental destruction, and sexual assault, make up yet another article of impeachment for Donald Trump awaiting only the awakening of a House of Representatives.
Incitement of acts of violence is a crime, and it is certainly a high-crime-and-misdemeanor, the Constitutional phrase referring to an abuse of power that may or may not be criminal.
Donald Trump went out of his way to persuade racists that they were free to engage in their racism openly. Numerous racists, including some of those who have been active in Charlottesville, have openly communicated their understanding of that presidential permission. Those sitting silently by in this moment are condoning racism. So are those not advocating for impeachment and removal.
Yes I am aware of the general horror of Mike Pence, but a country that impeached and removed presidents would be a very different country in which the next president would have to behave or face impeachment in turn. Fear of the next person will look ever weaker as grounds for allowing the current person to destroy things as he proceeds with his destruction.
I'm further aware that the D.C. Democratic leadership makes Mayor Signer's cynicism look like child's play, and that Nancy Pelosi wants Trump around more than the Republicans do, so that the Democrats can "oppose" him. But I'm not asking you to believe he's going to be impeached without your doing anything. I'm asking you to compel his impeachment.
6. The answer to racist violence is not anti-racist violence or passivism, and the idea that those are the only two choices is ridiculous.
Charlottesville's and the United States' resistance to racism would be far stronger with disciplined nonviolence. The behavior of a few anti-racists in July allowed the corporate media to depict the KKK as victims.
There is nothing the alt-right crowd longs for more in this moment than some act of violence against them that would permit pundits to start trumpeting the need for liberals to be more tolerant of racists, and to proclaim that the real problem is those reckless radicals who want to tear down statues.
We need nonviolent activism, and we need a thousand times more of it. We need to initiate the next rally in Charlottesville ourselves.
7. Tearing down statues is not opposing history.
Charlottesville has three Confederate war statues, two (pro) genocide of the Native Americans statues, one World War I statue, one Vietnam War memorial, one statue of Thomas Jefferson (whose words and deeds, I'm sorry to say, agreed almost entirely with the latest racists), and one statue of Homer (poet of war). And that's it.
We have no memorials, whether monumental statuary or otherwise, to a single educator, artist, musician, athlete, author, or activst, nothing for Native American history, slavery, civil rights, women's rights, or ANYTHING ELSE.
Almost all of our history is missing. Putting up a giant statue for racism and war is not a step for history. Taking it down is not a blow to history. It could be a step forward, in fact. Even the renaming of Lee Park as Emancipation Park is educational. Creating a memorial to emancipation, and one to civil rights, and one to school integration, and one to peace would be more so.
8. The Lee statue is still there, not because racists rally around it, but because legislators glorify war.
While neither side has any interest in opposing or even particularly in promoting war, and while the national and local media have gone through endless contortions to avoid mentioning it, the court case holding up the removal of Robert E. Lee and the horse he never rode in on is about war glorification. A state law that may or may not apply to this statue forbids taking down war memorials in Virginia.
For fair and balanced free-speech advocates I should note that no similar law forbids taking down peace monuments. Also there really aren't any to take down if you wanted to. This is a symptom of a culture that has come to accept endless war and the militarization of local police, and to report on rallies of "white nationalists" without ever considering that there may be a problem with both of those words.
9. As I've written in recent months, many sympathizers with the racist cause are understandable.
This is a quite different thing from being acceptable or praise worthy. To say that someone is understandable is to say that you can understand them. They're not monsters acting on inexplicable subhuman impulses any more than do the people they hate or the people against whom the United States wages wars typically behave that way.
These racists live in one of the most unequal societies ever known, and they don't live at the top of it. They hear about endless efforts to alleviate injustice toward all sorts of wronged groups that don't include them. They notice the cultural acceptability in comedy shows and elsewhere of mocking white people.
They seek a group identity. They seek others to blame. They seek others to place beneath themselves. And they hear hardly a peep out of Washington D.C. about creating universal rights and supports for everyone, as in Scandinavia. Instead they hear that hatred and violence and racism come with the Presidential seal of approval.
David Swanson is an author, activist, journalist, and radio host. He is director of WorldBeyondWar.org and campaign coordinator for RootsAction.org. Swanson's books include War Is A Lie. He blogs at DavidSwanson.org and WarIsACrime.org. He hosts Talk Nation Radio. He is a 2015, 2016, 2017 Nobel Peace Prize Nominee.
Follow him on Twitter: @davidcnswanson and FaceBook.