War on the Biosphere: Trump Disbands Climate Committee
August 21, 2017
Chas Danner / New York Magazine & The Independent
In yet another move that indicates the White House does not take the threat of climate change seriously, the Trump administration has disbanded a federal advisory panel that worked to translate the government's climate data into insight for policymakers and the private sector. The 15-member Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment was tasked with helping public and private-sector officials integrate the findings of the National Climate Assessment into their long-term planning.
Trump Administration Disbands Climate-Change Advisory Panel
Chas Danner / New York Magazine
(August 20, 2017) -- In yet another move that indicates the White House does not take the threat of climate change seriously, the Trump administration has disbanded a federal advisory panel that worked to translate the government's climate data into actionable insight for policymakers and the private sector, according to a report in the Washington Post.
The 15-member Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment included academics, corporate representatives, and local officials who were tasked with helping public and private-sector officials understand the findings of the National Climate Assessment so that the information could factor into their long-term planning.
Put more simply, the panel, which was founded in 2015, existed to make sure government data was able help both the public and private sectors prepare for the inevitability and disruptiveness of climate change. Instead, as of Sunday, the panel no longer exists, and such advice will have to be obtained elsewhere.
The National Climate Assessment is a quadrennial report which summarizes the current and future impacts of climate change on the United States.
A draft of part of the upcoming 2018 assessment was leaked this year by government scientists who were worried the report might be buried or suppressed by the Trump administration, which is staffed by more than a few officials -- including the new head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Scott Pruitt -- who deny the scientific consensus that human activity is the primary cause of global warming.
President Trump also announced earlier this year that he will pull the US out of the 2015 Paris Climate Accord, which aimed to internationally limit greenhouse gas emissions in order to mitigate some of the worst effects of global warming.
A spokesperson for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration insisted to the Post that Friday's disbanding of the climate advisory committee would have no effect on next year's Climate Assessment, but it's hard to see how business, state, and local officials will be better off without the group's advice on how to act on it.
Furthermore, last week President Trump signed an executive order that overturned an Obama-administration rule requiring that infrastructure projects in coastal plains, or that are receiving federal aid, account for projected sea-level rise.
The reason for that rule was that rising sea levels, in addition to more extreme weather, will likely result in more serious and more frequent flooding for such infrastructure, so the rule was a way to mandate that those projects be engineered with that likelihood in mind.
Now, per the White House, it will be left to state and local officials to set their own standards for the projects, and without advice from the disbanded panel.
As an example of why the advisory committee was important, the Postreports that they were working to make sure the American Society of Civil Engineers would get the detailed data they needed to help develop new building codes based on the National Climate Assessment, rather than on historical weather records which are no longer likely to be adequate by themselves.
The committee's chair, Dr. Richard H. Moss, a senior scientist at the Joint Global Change Research Institute, told the Post that disbanding the group was "short-sighted."
"We're going to be running huge risks here and possibly end up hurting the next generation's economic prospects," he warned.
Trump Administration 'Disbands Climate Change Advisory Panel'
The Independent, US Staff
(August 20, 2017) -- The administration of President Donald Trump has decided to disband a federal advisory panel on climate change -- in a further sign of the White House's view on environmental policy.
The panel is part of the National Climate Assessment, a group aimed at helping officials and policy makers integrate the US Government's climate change analysis into their long-term planning.
A mandate for the 15-member Advisory Committee for the Sustained National Climate Assessment is set to expire on Sunday, and will not be renewed.
The acting administrator for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Ben Friedman, is said to have informed the committee's chair that the agency would not renew the panel, according to a report in The Washington Post.
The National Climate Assessment is supposed to be released every four years, but it has only been put out three times since 1990, when a law calling for such analysis was created.
The advisory panel, made of up of academics and local officials -- is supposed to help translate the analysis provided by the assessment into concrete proposals and guidance for local authorities.
The next National Climate Assessment is due for release in 2018, but a document expected to be a key part of the assessment is currently under review by the Trump administration.
The report, known as the Climate Science Special Report, finds it is "extremely likely" that more than half of the rise in temperatures over the past four decades has been caused by human activity -- in contrast to some of Mr. Trump's cabinet members' views, who consider the magnitude of that contribution to be uncertain.
The draft report -- which was leaked -- estimates that human impact is responsible for a increase in global temperatures of 1.1 to 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit from 1951 to 2010.
As for disbanding the committee, its chairman thinks it is a bad idea. "It doesn't seem to be the best course of action," Richard Moss, an adjunct professor in the University of Maryland's Department of Geographical Sciences, told The Washington Post.
"We're going to be running huge risks here and possibly end up hurting the next generation's economic prospects," Mr. Moss said, referring to infrastructure projects that might rely on the analysis.
However, the NOAA said in a statement that "this action does not impact the completion of the Fourth National Climate Assessment, which remains a key priority."
Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, US Code, for noncommercial, educational purposes.