Environmentalists Against War
Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are

 

 

Commemorating 17 Years of Getting Afghanistan Completely Wrong


September 29, 2018
David Swanson / David Swanson.org & World BEYOND War

Commentary & Analysis: There are, as far as I know, no polls on the percentage of people in the United States who know that the war is still going on, but it seems to be pretty low. Polling Report lists no polls at all on Afghanistan in the past three years. For longer than most wars have lasted in total, this one has gone on with no public discussion of whether or not it should, just annual testimony before Congress that this next year is going to really be the charm.

http://davidswanson.org/17-years-of-getting-afghanistan-completely-wrong/

17 Years of Getting Afghanistan Completely Wrong
David Swanson / David Swanson.org & World BEYOND War

Thus far, the United States has spent
an outrageous $783 billion with virtually nothing
to show for it except the death of thousands of
US soldiers, and the death, injury
and displacement of millions of Afghans.


(September 28, 2018) -- We expect 17-year-olds to have learned a great deal starting from infancy, and yet full-grown adults have proven incapable of knowing anything about Afghanistan during the course of 17 years of US-NATO war. Despite war famously being the means of Americans learning geography, few can even identify Afghanistan on a map. What else have we failed to learn?

The war has not ended
There are, as far as I know, no polls on the percentage of people in the United States who know that the war is still going on, but it seems to be pretty low. Polling Report lists no polls at all on Afghanistan in the past three years.

For longer than most wars have lasted in total, this one has gone on with no public discussion of whether or not it should, just annual testimony before Congress that this next year is going to really be the charm. Things people don't know are happening are not polled about, which contributes to nobody knowing they are happening.

Possible reasons for such ignorance include:
there have been too many wars spawned by this one to keep track of them all;
* President Obama claimed to have "ended" the war while explicitly and actually not ending it, and pointing this out could be impolite;
* a war embraced by multiple presidents and both big political parties is not a useful topic for partisan politics;
* very few of the people suffering and dying are from the United States;
* very similar stories bore journalists and editors after 17 years of regurgitating them;
* when the war on Iraq became too unpopular in the United States, the war on Afghanistan was fashioned into a "good war" so that people could oppose one war while making clear their support for war in general, and it would be inconvenient to raise too many questions about the good war;
* it's hard to tell the story of permanent imperial occupation without it sounding a little bit like permanent imperial occupation; and
* the only other story that could be developed would be the ending of the war -- which nobody in power is proposing and which could raise the embarrassing question of why it wasn't done 5, 10, or 17 years ago.

The war is not the longest US war ever
Among those who know the war exists, a group I take to include disproportionately those involved in fighting it and those trying to end it, a popular claim is that it is the longest US war ever. But the United States has not formally declared a war since 1941.

How one picks where a war starts and stops is controversial. There is certainly a strong case to be made that the never-ending war-sanctions/bombings-war assault on Iraq has been longer than the war on Afghanistan.

There's a stronger case that the US war on Vietnam was also longer, depending on when you decide it began. The war on North (and South) Korea has yet to be ended, and ending it is the top demand of a united Korean people to their Western occupiers.

The centuries-long war on the indigenous peoples of North America is generally ignored, I believe, principally because those people are not legally or politically thought of as actual real people but more as something resembling rodents. And yet it is important for us to recognize that none of the wars taught in US school texts took even a tiny fraction of this length of time, and that even applying the same name ("war") to:
(1) things that happened for limited and scheduled durations in empty fields between soldiers with primitive weapons *and* to
(2) endless aerial and high-tech assaults on people's towns and cities is questionable.

Military glory is to glory as military justice
and military music are to justice and music

For most of the duration of this war, participation in which is supposed to be called glorious, the top cause of death in the US military has been suicide What more powerful statement can someone make against glorifying what they have been engaged in than killing themselves?

And sending more people off to kill and die in order not to disrespect the people who have already killed themselves, so that they not have killed themselves "in vain," is the definition of insanity squared -- it's insanity gone insane. That it may be common sense doesn't change that; it just gives us the task of causing our society to go sane.

Benjamin Franklin is still right:
There has never been a good war

When it became convenient for politicians and others to present Afghanistan as "the good war," many began to imagine that whatever had been done wrong in Iraq had been done right in Afghanistan:
* the war had been UN authorized, civilians had not been targeted, nobody had been tortured, the occupation had been wisely planned;
* the war had been and was just and necessary and unavoidable and humanitarian;
* in fact all the good war needed was more of what it was, while the bad war in Iraq needed less.

None of these fantasies was true. Each was and is blatantly false.

"They started it" is always a lie, because
it's always used to start something

Most everyone supposes that the United States invaded Afghanistan in 2001 and has stayed there ever since as a series of "last resorts," even though the Taliban repeatedly offered to turn bin Laden over to a third country to stand trial, al Qaeda has had no significant presence in Afghanistan for most of the duration of the war, and withdrawal has been an option at any time.

The United States, for three years prior to September 11, 2001, had been asking the Taliban to turn over Osama bin Laden. The Taliban had asked for evidence of his guilt of any crimes and a commitment to try him in a neutral third country without the death penalty. Those don't seem like unreasonable demands. At the very least they don't seem irrational or crazy. They seem like the demands of someone with whom negotiations might be continued.

The Taliban also warned the United States that bin Laden was planning an attack on US soil (this according to the BBC). Former Pakistani Foreign Secretary Niaz Naik told the BBC that senior US officials told him at a UN-sponsored summit in Berlin in July 2001 that the United States would take action against the Taliban in mid-October. He said it was doubtful that surrendering bin Laden would change those plans.

When the United States attacked Afghanistan on October 7, 2001, the Taliban asked to negotiate handing over bin Laden to a third country to be tried, dropping the demand to see any evidence of guilt. The United States rejected the offer and continued a war in Afghanistan for many years, not halting it when bin Laden was believed to have left that country, and not even halting it after announcing bin Laden's death.

Perhaps there were other reasons to keep the war going for a dozen years, but clearly the reason to begin it was not that no other means of resolving the dispute were available.

Punishing a government that was willing to turn over an accused criminal, by spending 17 years bombing and killing that nation's people (most of whom had never heard of the attacks of September 11, 2001, much less supported them, and most of whom hated the Taliban) doesn't appear to be a significantly more civilized action than shooting a neighbor because his great-uncle stole your grandfather's pig.

Tony Blair has a lot to answer for
Blame is, contrary to popular opinion, not a finite quantity. I don't deny an ounce of it to Bush or Cheney or every single member of the US Congress except Barbara Lee, or just about every employee and owner of US corporate media, or numerous profiteers and weapons dealers and death marketers of all variety.

I blame history teachers, military recruiters, NATO, every member of NATO, the UN Security Council, the people who designed the UN Security Council, priests and preachers, Harry Truman, Winston Churchill, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Hillary Clinton, Steven Spielberg, Thomas Jefferson, Wolf Blitzer, flag manufacturers, any neighbor of Paul Wolfowitz who didn't give him a talking to, and -- I'm confident in saying -- a lot more people than you blame.

I don't exclude them and I am not right now ranking them. But I would like permission to point out that Tony Blair belongs in this list and not on some panel discussing the principles of liberal humanitarian slaughter. Blair was willing to go along with Bush's attack on Iraq if Bush attacked Afghanistan first. Attacking a country because it would make marketing an attack on another country easier is a particularly slimy thing to do.

Afghanistan is Obama's war
Barack Obama campaigned on escalating the war on Afghanistan. His supporters either agreed with that, avoided knowing it, or told themselves that in their hero's heart of hearts he secretly opposed it -- which was apparently sufficient compensation for many when he went ahead and did it.

He tripled the US forces and escalated the bombings and created a campaign of drone murder. By every measure -- death, destruction, financial expense, troop deployment -- the war on Afghanistan is more Obama's war than anyone else's.

Trump lied
Candidate Trump said: "Let's get out of Afghanistan. Our troops are being killed by the Afghans we train and we waste billions there. Nonsense! Rebuild the USA."

President Trump escalated and continued the war, albeit at a much smaller scale than Obama had. And he had lied about the amount of money being spent. The notion that it could all be spent on useful things in the United States either underestimates the amount of money or overestimates US greed and powers of imagination.

This amount of money is so vast that one would almost certainly have to spend it on more than one country if spending it on useful human and environmental needs.

The people in charge of the war
don't believe in it any more than
the troops they order around


The view that further war, in particular with drones, is counterproductive on its own terms is shared by:
* US Lt. General Michael Flynn, who quit as head of the Pentagon's Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) in August 2014: "The more weapons we give, the more bombs we drop, that just… fuels the conflict."

* Former CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief Michael Scheuer, who says the more the United States fights terrorism the more it creates terrorism.

* The CIA, which finds its own drone program "counterproductive."

* Admiral Dennis Blair, the former director of National Intelligence: While "drone attacks did help reduce the Qaeda leadership in Pakistan," he wrote, "they also increased hatred of America."

* Gen. James E. Cartwright, the former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff: "We're seeing that blowback. If you're trying to kill your way to a solution, no matter how precise you are, you're going to upset people even if they're not targeted."

* Sherard Cowper-Coles, Former U.K. Special Representative To Afghanistan: "For every dead Pashtun warrior, there will be 10 pledged to revenge."

* Matthew Hoh, Former Marine Officer (Iraq), Former US Embassy Officer (Iraq and Afghanistan) : "I believe it's [the escalation of the war/military action] only going to fuel the insurgency. It's only going to reinforce claims by our enemies that we are an occupying power, because we are an occupying power. And that will only fuel the insurgency. And that will only cause more people to fight us or those fighting us already to continue to fight us." -- Interview with PBS on Oct 29, 2009

* General Stanley McChrystal: "For every innocent person you kill, you create 10 new enemies."

* Lt. Col. John W. Nicholson Jr. : This commander of the war who left that position last month, like most of the people above, pulled "an Eisenhower" and blurted out his opposition to what he'd been doing on his last day of doing it. The war should be ended, he said.

The Afghans have not benefitted
It's much desired in the United States to imagine that wars benefit the people bombed, and then to lament and point to their ignorant inability to feel grateful as a sign that they are in need of more bombing.

In reality, this war has taken a deeply troubled and impoverished country and made it 100 times worse, killing hundreds of thousands of people in the process, creating a refugee crisis being addressed courageously by Pakistan, and helping to destabilize half the globe.

The purposes have not been admirable
Invading Afghanistan had little or nothing to do with bin Laden or 9-11. The motivations in 2001 were in fact related to fossil fuel pipelines, the positioning of weaponry, political posturing, geo-political posturing, maneuvering toward an invasion of Iraq, patriotic cover for power grabs and unpopular policies at home, and profiteering from war and its expected spoils.

These are all either indefensible arguments or points that might have been negotiated or accomplished without bombs. During the course of the war its proponents have often been quite open about its actual purpose.

Permanent bases make war
permanent and do not bring peace

They just cut the ribbon for new construction at Camp Resolute Support. Can a ground breaking at Fort Over My Dead Body be far behind. It's important that we understand that permanent peace-bringing bases are neither.

The US has no responsibility to
do something before it gets the hell out

After the United States gets out, Afghanistan will continue to be one of the worst places on earth. It will be even worse, the longer the departure is delayed. Getting out is the principle responsibility.

The United States has no responsibility to do anything else first, such as negotiating the future of the Afghan people with some of their warlords. If I break into your house and kill your family and smash your furniture, I don't have a moral duty to spend the night and meet with a local gang to decide your fate. I have a moral and legal responsibility to get out of your house and turn myself in at the nearest police station.

The ICC is teasing, but what
if it starts to enjoy the teasing?

The international criminal court has never prosecuted a non-African, but has claimed for years to be investigating US crimes in Afghanistan. What if people began encouraging it to do its job. Not that I would suggest such a thing:
International Criminal Court
Post Office Box 19519
2500 CM The Hague
The Netherlands

otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int
Fax +31 70 515 8555

Too many wars is a reason to end them
That there are too many wars to keep track of them all is a reason to end each one and to end the entire institution of war before it ends us, as it has spiraled far out of control.

The damage is unlimited
The damage to Afghanistan is immeasurable. The natural environment has suffered severely. Cultures have been damaged. Children have been traumatized. US culture has been poisoned and militarized and made more bigoted and paranoid. We've lost freedoms in the name of freedom. The financial tradeoff has been unfathomable. The complete case is overwhelming.

Events you can attend

ACTION ALERT: Write to the White House
Tell Donald Trump: "End US War in Afghanistan"

The Action Network

The US war in Afghanistan is well into its 17th year. In 2014 President Obama declared it over, but it will remain a political, financial, security, legal, and moral problem unless you actually end it.

The US military now has approximately 11,000 US troops in Afghanistan, plus 4,000 more that you've sent, plus 7,148 other NATO troops, 1,000 mercenaries, and another 26,000 contractors (of whom about 8,000 are from the United States). That's 48,000 people engaged in a foreign occupation of a country 17 years after the accomplishment of their stated mission to overthrow the Taliban government.

During each of the past 17 years, our government in Washington has informed us that success was imminent. During each of the past 17 years, Afghanistan has continued its descent into poverty, violence, environmental degradation, and instability. The withdrawal of US and NATO troops would send a signal to the world, and to the people of Afghanistan, that the time has come to try a different approach, something other than more troops and weaponry.

The ambassador from the US-brokered and funded Afghan Unity government has reportedly told you that maintaining US involvement in Afghanistan is "as urgent as it was on Sept. 11, 2001." There's no reason to believe he won't tell you that for the next two years, even though John Kerry tells us “Afghanistan now has a well-trained armed force . . . meeting the challenge posed by the Taliban and other terrorists groups.” But involvement need not take its current form.

The United States is spending $4 million an hour on planes, drones, bombs, guns, and over-priced contractors in a country that needs food and agricultural equipment, much of which could be provided by US businesses.

Thus far, the United States has spent an outrageous $783 billion with virtually nothing to show for it except the death of thousands of US soldiers, and the death, injury and displacement of millions of Afghans.

The Afghanistan War has been and will continue to be, as long as it lasts, a steady source of scandalous stories of fraud and waste. Even as an investment in the US economy this war has been a bust.

But the war has had a substantial impact on our security: it has endangered us. Before Faisal Shahzad tried to blow up a car in Times Square, he had tried to join the war against the United States in Afghanistan. In numerous other incidents, terrorists targeting the United States have stated their motives as including revenge for the US war in Afghanistan, along with other US wars in the region. There is no reason to imagine this will change.

In addition, Afghanistan is the one nation where the United States is engaged in major warfare with a country that is a member of the International Criminal Court. That body has now announced that it is investigating possible prosecutions for US crimes in Afghanistan.

Over the past 17 years, we have been treated to an almost routine repetition of scandals: hunting children from helicopters, blowing up hospitals with drones, urinating on corpses -- all fueling anti-US propaganda, all brutalizing and shaming the United States.

Ordering young American men and women into a kill-or-die mission that was accomplished 17 years ago is a lot to ask. Expecting them to believe in that mission is too much. That fact may help explain this one: the top killer of US troops in Afghanistan is suicide.

The second highest killer of American military is green-on-blue, or the Afghan youth who the US is training are turning their weapons on their trainers! You yourself recognized this, saying: "Let's get out of Afghanistan. Our troops are being killed by the Afghans we train and we waste billions there. Nonsense! Rebuild the USA."

The withdrawal of US troops would also be good for the Afghan people, as the presence of foreign soldiers has been an obstacle to peace talks. The Afghans themselves have to determine their future, and will only be able to do so once there is an end to foreign intervention.

We urge you to turn the page on this catastrophic military intervention. Bring all US troops home from Afghanistan. Cease US airstrikes and instead, for a fraction of the cost, help the Afghans with food, shelter, and agricultural equipment.

Posted in accordance with Title 17, Section 107, for noncommercial, educational purposes.

back

 

 

Stay Connected
Sign up to receive our weekly updates. We promise not to sell, trade or give away your email address.
Email Address:
Full Name:
 

 

Search Environmentalists Against War website

 

Home | Say NO! To War | Action! | Information | Media Center | Who We Are