Secret US Plans for Iraq’s Oil
March 31, 2005
Greg Palast / BBC Newsnight
Why was Paul Wolfowitz pushed out of the Pentagon onto the World Bank? The answer lies in a previously secret 323-page document that reveals how the allies of Big Oil defeated the Bush Administration's neo-conservatives and their chief, Wolfowitz. BBC Television Newsnight exposed the hidden fall of the neo-cons in a broadcast that resulted from a joint investigation involving the BBC and Harper's magazine. The broadcast revealed that the US State Department drew up detailed plans for war in Iraq — and for Iraq's oil — within weeks of Bush's first inauguration in 2001. This story was headline news around the world but it went unreported in the US corporate media.
ACTION ALERT: Protests of Wolfowitz nomination set for April 15-17.
LONDON (March 17, 2005) — The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed.
Two years ago today - when President George Bush announced US, British and Allied forces would begin to bomb Baghdad - protestors claimed the US had a secret plan for Iraq's oil once Saddam had been conquered.
In fact there were two conflicting plans, setting off a hidden policy war between neo-conservatives at the Pentagon, on one side, versus a combination of "Big Oil" executives and US State Department "pragmatists."
"Big Oil" appears to have won. The latest plan, obtained by Newsnight from the US State Department was, we learned, drafted with the help of American oil industry consultants.
Insiders told Newsnight that planning began "within weeks" of Bush's first taking office in 2001, long before the September 11th attack on the US.
An Iraqi-born oil industry consultant, Falah Aljibury, says he took part in the secret meetings in California, Washington and the Middle East. He described a State Department plan for a forced coup d'etat.
Mr Aljibury himself told Newsnight that he interviewed potential successors to Saddam Hussein on behalf of the Bush administration.
Secret Sell-off Plan
The industry-favoured plan was pushed aside by yet another secret plan, drafted just before the invasion in 2003, which called for the sell-off of all of Iraq's oil fields. The new plan, crafted by neo-conservatives intent on using Iraq's oil to destroy the Opec cartel through massive increases in production above Opec quotas.
The sell-off was given the green light in a secret meeting in London headed by Ahmed Chalabi shortly after the US entered Baghdad, according to Robert Ebel. Mr. Ebel, a former Energy and CIA oil analyst, now a fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, flew to the London meeting, he told Newsnight, at the request of the State Department.
Mr Aljibury, once Ronald Reagan's "back-channel" to Saddam, claims that plans to sell off Iraq's oil, pushed by the US-installed Governing Council in 2003, helped instigate the insurgency and attacks on US and British occupying forces.
"Insurgents used this, saying, 'Look, you're losing your country, your losing your resources to a bunch of wealthy billionaires who want to take you over and make your life miserable," said Mr Aljibury from his home near San Francisco. "We saw an increase in the bombing of oil facilities, pipelines, built on the premise that privatization is coming."
Privatization Blocked by Industry
Philip Carroll, the former CEO of Shell Oil USA who took control of Iraq's oil production for the US Government a month after the invasion, stalled the sell-off scheme.
Mr Carroll told us he made it clear to Paul Bremer, the US occupation chief who arrived in Iraq in May 2003, that: "There was to be no privatization of Iraqi oil resources or facilities while I was involved."
The chosen successor to Mr Carroll, a Conoco Oil executive, ordered up a new plan for a state oil company preferred by the industry.
Ari Cohen, of the neo-conservative Heritage Foundation, told Newsnight that an opportunity had been missed to privatise Iraq's oil fields. He advocated the plan as a means to help the US defeat Opec, and said America should have gone ahead with what he called a "no-brainer" decision.
Mr Carroll hit back, telling Newsnight, "I would agree with that statement. To privatize would be a no-brainer. It would only be thought about by someone with no brain."
New plans, obtained from the State Department by Newsnight and Harper's Magazine under the US Freedom of Information Act, called for creation of a state-owned oil company favored by the US oil industry. It was completed in January 2004, Harper's discovered, under the guidance of Amy Jaffe of the James Baker Institute in Texas. Former US Secretary of State Baker is now an attorney. His law firm, Baker Botts, is representing ExxonMobil and the Saudi Arabian government.
View Segments of Iraq oil plans
Questioned by Newsnight, Ms Jaffe said the oil industry prefers state control of Iraq's oil over a sell-off because it fears a repeat of Russia's energy privatization. In the wake of the collapse of the Soviet Union, US oil companies were barred from bidding for the reserves.
Jaffe said "There is no question that an American oil company ... would not be enthusiastic about a plan that would privatize all the assets with Iraq companies and they (US companies) might be left out of the transaction."
In addition, Ms. Jaffe says US oil companies are not warm to any plan that would undermine Opec, "They [oil companies] have to worry about the price of oil."
"I'm not sure that if I'm the chair of an American company, and you put me on a lie detector test, I would say high oil prices are bad for me or my company."
The former Shell oil boss agrees. In Houston, he told Newsnight, "Many neo conservatives are people who have certain ideological beliefs about markets, about democracy, about this that and the other. International oil companies without exception are very pragmatic commercial organizations. They don't have a theology."
A State Department spokesman told Newsnight they intended "to provide all possibilities to the Oil Ministry of Iraq and advocate none".
Greg Palast is the author of the New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy. View his writings at www.GregPalast.com.
Leni von Eckardt contributed investigative research for this project.
Greg Palast's film — the result of a joint investigation by Newsnight and Harper's Magazine — was broadcast on Thursday, 17 March, 2005. Read the story in greater detail in the April issue of Harper's.
You can watch the program online from Democracy Now!
National Anti-War Coalition Opposes Wolfowitz Nomination to World Bank
United for Peace and Justice condemns
George W. Bush's choice of Paul Wolfowitz, the Iraq War Architect, to head the World Bank. The Peace Movement in invited to join April 15-17 in Washington, DC to oppose the Occupation of Iraq and the regressive policies of the World Bank and IMF.
NEW YORK, NY (March 30, 2005) -- United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ) condemns the Bush Administration's nomination of Paul Wolfowitz, architect of the Iraq War, to head the World Bank. UFPJ is calling on anti-war groups and individuals to join global justice activists for three days of protest against the World Bank and International Monetary Fund in Washington, DC, from April 15-17.
"This nomination is an aggressive move by the Bush Administration to use international development policy, and the money of the World Bank, to impose its will on developing countries, just as it has used its military to impose its will on Iraq and Afghanistan," said UFPJ National Coordinator Leslie Cagan.
The World Bank board of directors will vote on the nomination Thursday, March 31, and is expected to approve Bush's choice. Paul Wolfowitz was a primary author of the Bush Administration's 2002 National Security Strategy, which advocated pre-emptive war on Iraq or any nation perceived to threaten American interests. The strategy further called for US economic and military domination in every corner of the world.
In opposing the Wolfowitz appointment, UFPJ calls for the transformation of the World Bank from an exploitative organization to one that is truly committed to ending poverty and promoting sustainable development as an important step toward ending violence worldwide.
"The U.S. has historically used its power over the World Bank to exploit the resources of the developing world, at enormous cost to the people of the Global South and the environment," said Orin Langelle of the Global Justice Ecology Project http://www.globaljusticeecology.org, and UFPJ's Global Justice Working Group.
"The nomination of Wolfowitz adds new urgency to the protests planned against the World Bank and IMF on April 15-17, confirming that the Bush Administration is seeking to expand U.S. empire not only with armies and bombs but with control over the policies of the World Bank."
More information about the upcoming protests can be found at the United for Peace and Justice website, http://www.unitedforpeace.org.
United for Peace and Justice is the largest US. peace and justice coalition, with more than 1,000 groups under its umbrella. Since its founding in October 2002, UFPJ has spurred hundreds of protests and rallies around the country, including the two largest demonstrations against the Iraq war.
Contact: Bill Dobbs, (212) 868-5545 office, (917) 822-5422 mobile www.unitedforpeace.org
Alert forwarded by: Global Justice Ecology Project, PO Box 412, Hinesburg, VT 05461 +1.802.482.2689 ph/fax mailto:email@example.com http://www.globaljusticeecology.org